Cromford Report

Market Insights for Agents & Clients!

Stay informed with the latest Cromford Report updates! We share expert insights helping both agents and clients navigate Arizona’s ever-changing real estate market. Whether you’re buying, selling, or advising others, staying on top of market trends is key to making smart decisions.

The Cromford Report is a Detailed Analysis of the Phoenix Metro Housing Market. 

The data used to create the Cromford® Report is obtained from public records and obtained under license from the Arizona Regional Multiple Listing Service, Inc (ARMLS). Cromford Associates LLC and ARMLS expressly disclaim and make no representations or warranties of any kind, whether express, implied or statutory, as to the accuracy of the data used or the merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.

August 2026


Mid-Month Pricing Update and Forecast

August 17, 2026

For the monthly period ending August 15, we are currently recording a sales $/SF of $292.77, averaged across all areas and types in the ARMLS database. This is down 3.6% from the $303.74 we measured for July 15. Our forecast range midpoint was $300.36, so although we predicted a significant fall, we underestimated it by a large margin. The median sales price has remained much more stable. The monthly median price currently stands at $449,900, down from $451,000 last month but up from $440,000 a year ago.

Because the luxury market is causing wild swings in average $/SF, we now prefer median price per square foot, which landed at $252.12. One month before, it read $254.86, and the same month last year was $251.19. Note how the measure didn’t jump all over the place like the average $/SF, showing how much the luxury market distorts the overall picture. So instead of the 3.6% month-to-month fall, the median $/SF shows a much smaller 1.1% drop and still a 0.4% increase over the same month last year.

On August 15, pending listings across all areas and types averaged $ 319.71/SF, up 0.6% from the July 15 reading. The median $/SF is $253.42, down from $255.10 a month earlier.

Notice that:

  • The median is substantially below the average (due to the luxury distortion being removed)

  • The median went down 0.7% while the average went up 0.6% – opposite signals

From now on, we will be using the median $/SF to create our one-month forecast. We expect this will improve our accuracy, but we will see.

Our forecast for September 15 median $/SF is $251, with an 80% confidence range of $249 to $254. For the median sales price, we forecast $448,000 with an 80% confidence range of $445,000 to $456,000.

This suggests that closed prices are likely to fall slightly over the next month, though less than over the last month. We are in the middle of the summer season, which tends to be the weakest period of the year in Greater Phoenix. No prizes for guessing why.

Among listings under contract, 94.6% are normal, 1.5% are REOs, and 3.9% are pre-foreclosures (including a very small number of short sales). Distress is noticeably higher than last month and, though it remains low compared to the 25-year average, we are seeing a distinct upward trend in pre-foreclosure activity. Lender-owned listings remain low, suggesting that many pre-foreclosures are being resolved by sale before the trustee has to step in.

Normal listings represented 97.5% of listings under contract 12 months ago, so distress has clearly risen, which should serve as an early warning. However, we must keep it in perspective: between 2011 and 2012, the normal percentage was below 25%, and between 2013 and 2019 we averaged 85% normal. We are still better off than during that period, but the improving trend has reversed since 2022, especially in the last 6 months, and is now quietly flashing amber instead of green.

July 2026 - Infographic

Cromford Market Snapshot - August 16, 2026

CMI Large City Ranking Table August 13, 2026

The average CMI is up 2.1% from last month. This is slightly more favorable for sellers than last week’s 1.8%, but almost all the heavy lifting was done by Paradise Valley. The reason PV has an unusually high CMI right now is that half the listings we had in May have disappeared. 98 listings have been canceled in the last 3 months, while another 27 expired. This is more than the number of closings (94). Fountain Hills, Scottsdale, and Cave Creek all improved as well for similar but less dramatic reasons.

The rest of the market is still suffering from weak demand, but the Southeast Valley has stabilized somewhat.

The number of cities moving in a direction favorable to sellers is 10, which is 2 more than last week. We have 8 moving in a direction that is favorable to buyers. The most movement for buyers is in Buckeye, Peoria, Glendale, and Tempe.

We once again have 8 cities in a seller’s market, 4 balanced, and 6 in a buyer’s market.

Price Analysis: Part Three – A Longer-Term View

August 12, 2026

In our last two posts, we studied the weak period in the housing market that has lasted since the froth of the COVID frenzy blew away. Using the most recent price peak as the baseline means almost all methods of measuring home prices show a gloomy picture because, by definition, we started at the top of the market, which, for the vast majority of segments, was in the second quarter of 2022. Gloom should really be confined to home sellers, however, because from a home buyer’s perspective, their target homes have become far more affordable. Median incomes have grown substantially since mid-2022, and home prices have mostly gone down or stabilized. This is especially true in the lower tiers of the market. Only at the luxury end of the market have we seen substantial rises in home prices since mid 2022 in Greater Phoenix.

The buyers who purchased in the first half of 2022 are the ones who suffered the worst effects of this recent price trend. If you remember this 6-month period, the majority of buyers during those crazy months were iBuyers and institutional investors. Normal buyers could barely get a look-in as each home got dozens of offers. We are probably not going to shed a tear for them.

Let us now look at price movements over 2 longer periods – 10 years from 2016 to 2026 (August in both cases) and 7 years from 2019 to 2026 (also August to August). The start dates were times when the market was positive but not frenzied, so this analysis should result in a more realistic vision of what has happened to home prices over 2 longer terms.

This process has underscored a couple of principles that we have acknowledged for some time.

  • Using price bands as a segmentation device is popular, but less than ideal because, over a long period, a large number of houses migrate from one band to another.

  • A better segmentation device is home size. Bigger homes tend to be more expensive than smaller ones, but homes do not tend to drift from one size band to another. The primary exception is when a small and old property is demolished to make way for a far grander replacement. This type of action is concentrated in Paradise Valley and Arcadia, where 16% to 18% of transactions involve a scrape and new build. An analysis of these 2 areas shows that it has a distorting effect on all price measurements. However, the median price per square foot is affected the least of all and remains largely undistorted. And in the rest of Greater Phoenix, fewer than 1.3% of transactions involve a complete rebuild.

So let us continue by using home size instead of price range as the segmentation. We will focus on single-family detached homes. Other types of homes have lost market share over this period, so including them would distort the picture a little more than we like.

Over ten years, we can confirm a very substantial increase in nominal median price per square foot since August 2016, with much of that happening after August 2019. We have already seen that most of the increase took place between 2020 and 2022. Nevertheless, in nominal terms, most homes more than doubled in price over the last 10 years.

We also notice several other things:

  • Homes over 6,000 square feet but below 10,001 won the competition easily over both periods.

  • Homes between 4,001 and 6,000 square feet came second over both periods.

  • Smaller homes of 1,500 square feet and under did well in the first 3 years but much less well from 2019 onwards.

  • The most common size of all, 1501 to 2,000 square feet, underperformed the rest of the market.

  • Homes over 10,000 square feet have appreciated substantially less than the range below them.

Before we get too excited, let us look instead at real $/SF, the above numbers adjusted for inflation by applying the Consumer Price Index and expressing all dollars in their June 2026 value.

These are all positive numbers, so over the longer-term 7-year and 10-year views, we have clear evidence of substantial appreciation even after inflation. The size bands are also closer together in that appreciation, though the 6,001 to 10,000 range is still first, with 4,001 to 6,000 in second place. It also suggests that going for a home over 10,000 sq. ft. might not be quite as rewarding an investment as one below 10,000 sq. ft.

Finally, since the first 2 posts in this series used price range as segmentation, let us re-examine the August 2022 to August 2026 period using home size instead. Adjusting for inflation, home prices have moved downwards except for homes between 4,001 and 10,000 square feet.

Starter homes, those under 2,000 square feet, have become substantially cheaper relative to inflation, down 16% to 17%. As you move upwards in home size, the picture improves until you reach 10,000 sq. ft. At the top end, over 10,000 sq. ft. homes begin to lose ground again, though this looks a lot less obvious when you convert to nominal dollars.

For completeness, here is the equivalent table in nominal dollars per square foot:

Cromford Market Snapshot - August 10, 2026

Prices Since the Peak: Part Two

August 9, 2026

Yesterday we sliced Greater Phoenix by dwelling type. This time we slice it by geographic region, single family detached only, and two regions refuse to follow the script everyone else stuck to.

Same method as yesterday: median $/SF (not average, not price), each closing’s own square footage doing the dividing, each region’s own peak month located rather than assumed. If you skipped yesterday’s Part 1, the short version is that median $/SF is the one number a luxury tail and a mix-of-home-sizes can’t quietly distort out from under you. We’re using it again here for the same reason.

Same Story, Eight Different Regions

Six of Greater Phoenix’s eight regions peaked right where you’d expect and have been sliding ever since. Two didn’t. The Northeast Valley and Central Phoenix kept climbing for years after the rest of the market had already turned, and the Northeast Valley in particular is sitting barely below where it stood back in May 2022.

The Northeast Valley is the outlier of outliers here: down just 1% from where it stood in May 2022, and it only touched its own all-time high two months ago. Central Phoenix took a different path to the same place, it kept rising past its May 2022 level for nearly three more years, peaked in March 2025, and has only recently started giving that back. Everywhere else, the peak came and went in the first half of 2022, right on schedule.

The Inflation Reality Check

Here’s where it gets less flattering for those two “resilient” regions. Restate every closing into today’s dollars using the Phoenix CPI, the same way we did in Part 1, and the story tightens up considerably.

Once inflation is stripped out, every region’s real peak lands within about six weeks of each other, March through May 2022. Central Phoenix and the Northeast Valley weren’t genuinely gaining real value for years after everyone else stopped, but they were running just fast enough to keep pace with the cost of living, and the Northeast Valley barely even managed that. The real declines are also far more uniform than the nominal table suggested, thirteen to twenty-two percent across the board, instead of the four-to-fourteen percent spread that made a couple of regions look almost untouched.

Nominal dollars can make a region look like it dodged the correction. Real dollars mostly just show it running to stand still.

So Is the High End Actually Different?

We know that the skew between average and median $/SF has been widening because the top of the market is buoyant while everything beneath it slowly sinks. The Northeast Valley and Central Phoenix, both disproportionately home to the region’s priciest listings, hinted at it. So we isolated the actual luxury tier directly: every Single Family Detached closing over $2,000,000, set against everything under it.

There is the evidence. The under-$2M market is down over 10% from its May 2022 high, the same as every “normal” region we looked at above. But the $2M+ tier is up nearly 5% since May 2022, and still only 6.5% off an all-time high it set two months ago. Two completely different markets, moving in opposite directions.

Even the real numbers back this up, and they back it up in a more interesting way than the regions did. The under-$2M market’s real peak is May 2022, exactly where the nominal peak sits, and it’s down nearly 20% in real terms since. The $2M+ tier’s real peak isn’t May 2022 at all; it’s January 2023, eight months later. That’s not a segment running to keep pace with inflation. That’s a segment that kept genuinely gaining real value for the better part of a year after the rest of the market had already turned over, and even now, its real decline from that later peak (12%) is barely more than half of what the broader market has given back (20%).

One more data point is crucial: the $2M+ tier isn’t just holding its price better, it’s also transacting more often. Monthly closings in that segment averaged 115 a month in 2022; year-to-date in 2026 that’s up to 178 a month, a 55% increase in volume. Whatever is happening at the top of the market, it isn’t a shrinking pool of buyers propping up a thin, illiquid segment. More buyers are showing up for it than three years ago. We presume they are using profits from the stcok market or exercising their stock options and, probably wisely, diversifying into some rather nice real estate.

Conclusions

Six of eight Greater Phoenix regions, and the entire under-$2M Single Family Detached market with them, peaked in the first half of 2022 and have been giving up ground in real terms ever since, roughly 13 to 22% after adjusting for inflation, depending on where you look. The $2M+ tier is a different market: it kept gaining real value into early 2023, it’s still near an all-time high in nominal terms, and more buyers are closing on it than at any point in the last four years. So we have two different markets, and averaging them together is exactly what is making the average versus median skew far larger than is normal.

Why Median $/SF Doesn’t Lie (and What It Says About Phoenix Since May 2022)

August 8, 2026

Averages are for people who don’t want to know the truth. Here’s why we measure the market the way we do — and what four years of real numbers say about where your dwelling type actually stands since the peak.

The Case Against Averages (and Half of Medians)

There are four common ways to measure what homes are actually selling for, and three of them are lying to you at least a little. Let’s meet the lineup.

Average price is the one to distrust most. One $8 million Paradise Valley estate closes, and suddenly the “average” home in your ZIP code just got $40,000 more expensive, even though not a single normal house changed in value. Averages get dragged around by whatever sits in the upper-end tail, and in a market with a genuine luxury boom, the tail has been doing a lot of wagging lately. Beware of anyone quoting averages. In math, average means mean, but it does NOT mean typical.

Median price fixes the mansion problem. It just reports the home in the exact middle, immune to how rich the top 1% happen to be that month. But it has a quieter and more subtle flaw: it doesn’t know the difference between “homes got more expensive” and “bigger homes happened to sell this month.” If townhomes have a slow month and 4-bedroom Chandler SFRs have a hot one, the median price rises even though nothing about per-square-foot value moved at all. Median price answers “what’s a typical sale,” not “what’s a typical home worth.”

Average price per square foot gets closer; dividing by size at least controls for the mix-of-homes problem. But it’s still an average, so it still gets pulled around by outliers. We checked this directly on our own numbers a few weeks back: in July, 62% of Greater Phoenix closings sold for less than the average $/SF. Not close to half – 62%. That’s what happens when a resurgent luxury tier pulls the average upward while the rest of the market treads water or sinks beneath it. We measured the skew itself: three years ago the average ran about 8% above the median; today it runs over 10% above it, and touched nearly 13% this past January. The gap between “average” and “typical” has been quietly widening the whole time. This is why we are less comfortable with using the average $/SF than we used to be.

Median price per square foot is the one that survives both problems. Divide by size, so a slow month for big houses doesn’t fake a price move. Take the median, not the mean, so one compound in Silverleaf doesn’t speak for the other 6,000 closings that month. It’s the closest thing to “what did a typical square foot of a typical home actually sell for,” which is the only question most buyers and sellers actually care about. It’s the metric we used for everything below. We have not used it before because it is less well-known, and until 2026 it was much harder to persuade Tableau and Excel to calculate it accurately.

And here’s the part nobody likes to hear: median $/SF has no marketing department, and its average-based cousins do. Take the average of anything witha luxury tail – price, or price per square foot – and the tail pulls the average above the median every time. We measured both. Average price has been running 31–37% above median price over the last three years (31.1% three years ago, 34.1% two years ago, 36.5% over the last twelve months), and the gap is getting wider. Average $/SF runs the same way but by a smaller margin, about 8–10% above median $/SF, because dividing by square footage already strips out half of what was inflating the average price figure: it can’t get fooled by size anymore, only by rate. Average price gets fooled by both a rich buyer and a big house; average $/SF only gets fooled by the rich buyer. Median $/SF is the one number immune to both. When it reads lower than the figure your neighbor is quoting from a headline, that’s not the metric gaslighting you; it’s the average, doing what averages do when the top of the market is running away from the rest of it.

So why hasn’t this been our headline number all along? Average $/SF and median price are each one line of SQL, and Tableau will hand you either from asingle drag-and-drop. Until the recent boom in luxury homes, they seemed adequate and had the advantage of simplicity. Median $/SF is much messier. It makes you divide price by size on every individual closing before you’re allowed to touch an aggregate function. It is relatively heavy lifting, and until recently any median $/SF charts would have been much slower to render, which is not a popular thing with our subscribers. It has only been in the last few months that we have used median $/SF, once the programming tools we use got powerful enough to make the complex numbers no harder to pull than the easy ones. Going forward, you can expect us to focus more on the median $/SF, especially in the new website launching later this year.

So, Since the Peak …

May 2022 gets treated as the top of the market in mostconversations, and for the two dwelling types that make up most of Greater Phoenix’s volume, that’s exactly right. But not every category peaked on cue — and once you strip out four years of inflation, the story gets considerably less flattering for everyone.

Loft Style and Modular/Pre-Fab were omitted because there are too few monthly closings for a reliable median.

Single Family Detached, by far the biggest category and the one that shapes most people’s mental image of “the market,” is also the most resilient, down under 10% from its own peak. That’s a big part of why May 2022 feels like the peak in the popular imagination: the category with the most closings set the tone.

Apartment-style units took it the hardest, down over 22% from their own high. And Patio Home is the outlier that breaks the whole “everyone peaked in May 2022” narrative: it kept climbing for two more years and didn’t top out until May 2024. Judge it against May 2022 like everything else, and it looks like it barely moved, down just 8%. Judge it against its own actual peak, and it’s down almost 17%, comparable to the twin homes and mobile/manufactured housing around it.

The lesson: “since the peak” only means something if you know when your peak actually was. For half these categories, it wasn’t May 2022.

Real Dollars: The Numbers That Actually Matter

Here’s the part that nominal prices hide from you. A dollar today buys less than a dollar did in May 2022, a lot less, after the run of strong inflation we’ve all lived through. So even a home that’s still fetching the “same price” it did four years ago has quietly lost real value the whole time. To see the true picture, we restated every closing’s own price per square foot into today’s dollars – June 2026 dollars – using the Phoenix Metro Consumer Price Index (CPI), before computing anything. Not by inflating the finished chart afterward; every single closing gets adjusted using its own month’s cost of living, then we take the median $/SF.

National CPI tells nearly the identical story (Single Family −21.11%, Apartment-style −31.67%, Patio Home −24.77% from its own peak), but we’re using the Phoenix-area series above since it reflects our own local cost of living rather than a national blend; the picture doesn’t really change much based on which CPI data you prefer.

Two things jump out immediately. First, every single category’s real decline is dramatically worse than its nominal one. We’re talking 20% to 30% down in real terms, against 10% to 23% nominal. Prices that “held up” in the headline number were quietly losing a fifth to nearly a third of their real worth the entire time. If you already thought inflation was a bad thing, now you know it is.

Second, look what happens to Patio Homes once you strip out inflation. Their real peak wasn’t May 2024 after all. It was September 2022, a few months behind most of the pack, which mostly topped out in April and May 2022, but a full 20 months ahead of where the nominal chart said they peaked. Everything between September 2022 and May 2024 wasn’t a gain at all; it was Patio Homes running just fast enough to keep up with the cost of living, and not one step further. Once you account for that, they are still down over 22% from their own real high, closer to the rest of the field than the standout survivors they looked like in nominal dollars.

The Takeaway

Single Family Detached remains the most resilient category in Greater Phoenix by a comfortable margin, in both nominal and real terms — but “most resilient” still means down roughly a fifth in real purchasing power since the peak. Apartment-style units have had the roughest ride of the categories with reliable volume. The high-end luxury market is a different animal entirely, and we will look at it in a forthcoming observation.

CMI Large City Ranking Table August 6, 2026

The average CMI is up 1.8% from last month. This is more favorable for sellers than last week, but it is all due to the expensive end of the market, where active listings are reduced for the summer but demand remains healthy. The rest of the market is still suffering from weak demand that is drifting slightly downwards as interest rates rise.

The number of cities moving in a direction favorable to buyers is eleven once again. We have seven moving in a direction that is favorable to sellers. Among these, Paradise Valley stands out for sellers with an even more extreme +42%, with Cave Creek far behind at +9% and the rest at +4% or less. Paradise Valley has now opened up a large lead over Fountain Hills, with Scottsdale third.

In the other direction, San Tan Valley (-6%) and Tempe (-8%) are the pacemakers.

We once again have 8 cities in a seller’s market, 4 balanced, and 6 in a buyer’s market.

Maricopa Affidavit Statistics for July 2026

July 2026 had 22 working days, the same as July 2025 but one more than June 2026. This means the year-over-year comparison needs no calendar adjustment, while it would be fair to expect about 5% more closings than in June. Total closings came in at 6,210, up 1.7% year-over-year, and because the working days match exactly, that is a genuine gain rather than a calendar effect. Resale closings did all the work, up 7.3%, while new home closings fell substantially by 19.7%. The month-over-month picture is far less encouraging: closings dropped 11.1% despite July’s extra working day, which amounts to a decline of more than 15% once we adjust for the calendar.

New home sales have underwhelmed for several months in succession, and July brought no relief whatsoever. Having favored new homes in 2024 and 2025, buyers have continued to shift toward re-sales during 2026, and the gap is widening rather than closing.

The overall median sales price was $470,000, down 0.8% from July 2025 and 1.1% from June. In nominal terms, we can regard this as close to flat, but once we account for inflation, homes have again become more affordable relative to median earnings. Prices reversed last month’s pattern, with the new home median rising 4.8% month-over-month to $534,999 while the resale median fell 2.8% to $452,000. Given how sharply new home volume dropped, a shift in the mix of new homes that closed toward the high end provides the explanation, rather than genuine price strength among new homes.

New homes accounted for 16.3% of the Maricopa County market in July, down from 20.6% this time last year. That is a 4.3 percentage-point decline, meaning new homes have given up more than a fifth of their market share in twelve months. The one crumb of comfort for builders is that share edged up from June’s 15.8%. We anticipate closing volumes staying soft through August and September, with the median drifting slightly lower in nominal terms, though the usual seasonal change in mix should lend some support to prices from October onwards.

Market Summary for the Beginning of August 2026

The market in early August presents a more mixed picture than we saw a month ago. Compared with July 2025, the completed numbers still look good — closed listings, average $/SF, median sales price, the annual sales rate and monthly dollar volume are all higher. But the forward-looking measures have turned: listings under contract, pending listings and the contract ratio are all below where they stood a year ago. That is a change from last month, when every metric on this table compared favorably with a year earlier, and it deserves attention.

Supply continues to drift lower. Active listings excluding UCB and CCBS fell 2.1% over the month to 24,049 and are now marginally below the count of a year ago, while the measure including UCB and CCBS declined more steeply at 3.7%. Days of inventory eased to 127.1, down from 132.4 a month ago and 136.0 this time last year. The seasonal pattern is familiar: sellers who have not found a buyer through the hottest part of the summer tend to withdraw and wait for cooler weather and more active buyers in the fall. This effect is most significant in the luxury segment and in 55+ communities. The regular market in the low and lower mid-range is seeing a rise in inventory since last month. The fall in the listing success rate, from 69.9% to 59.5%, tells a negative story — a far larger share of sellers left the market during July without a sale.

Demand weakened over the month by rather more than the headline suggests. Closed listings fell 11.7% from June to July, but July had 22 working days against June’s 21. Adjusting for that, closings per working day were down closer to 16%. The comparison with July 2025 is cleaner, since both months had 22 working days, and on that basis closings are up 3.3%. The annual comparison therefore remains positive even though momentum through the summer has clearly slowed.

Pricing is holding up better than transaction counts. The average price per square foot slipped 2.2% over the month but remains 3.9% above July 2025, and the median sales price is down just 0.7% for the month while staying 2.3% higher than a year ago. Sellers are still achieving 97.34% of list price, fractionally better than both last month and last year, which suggests those who do transact are negotiating from a reasonable position. The overall picture is a market that is quiet and seasonally subdued rather than one under stress — but the weakness in pending and under-contract counts means we should not assume a strong autumn recovery. We anticipate prices getting weaker over the next 6 to 8 weeks, but a rebound is likely once the luxury market makes a bigger contribution to the mix from October onwards.

Cromford Market Snapshot - August 2, 2026

Case-Shiller Home Price Index – Adjusted for Inflation

August 1, 2026

We publish Case-Shiller Index numbers for 20 metro areas in a line chart that lets you compare the 20 cities. However, until now these have been the simple numbers published by S&P/Cotality. The chart has just been modified so you can see the effect of inflation on house prices in the same 20 cities.

The original data is called “nominal” and represents the initial values. The control at the bottom of the chart allows you to choose either the National Consumer Price Index or the Phoenix Metro Consumer Price Index and apply this to the Case-Shiller Home Price Index.

Below is the chart using the HPI numbers for Phoenix using the CPI for Phoenix.

Adjusting for inflation increases index values for earlier dates because everything is converted to US dollars at their value in the most recent CPI release. This chart shows us that the peak of 2022 was not quite as extreme as 2006 and that homes are now 14% less expensive than they were in May 2022 and 17% less expensive than they were in December 2005.

It also shows that home prices adjusted for inflation have been falling slowly over the last 2 years. This is consistent with the Cromford Market Index being less than 90 for most of that period.

Among the other 19 cities, you will find many differing patterns for price behavior, so I encourage you to try the chart out for yourself. Atlanta, Boston, and Charlotte are the only metros among the 20 where it is reasonably valid to claim that homes are the most expensive they have ever been.

July 2026


CMI Large City Ranking Table - July 31, 2026

The average CMI is up 0.3% from last month. This is more favorable for sellers than last week, but not by much. The market lacks direction but there is a very clear distinction between the top and the bottom. The most expensive areas are getting easier for sellers while the least expensive are getting easier for buyers.

The number of cities moving in a direction favorable to buyers is eleven, one less than last week. We have only six moving in a direction that is favorable to sellers, while Phoenix is stationary. Among these, Paradise Valley stands out for sellers with an exceptional +32%, with Cave Creek and Glendale far behind at +8% and +5%. Paradise Valley has now overtaken Fountain Hills to claim the top spot.

In the other direction, the Southeast Valley is the main region moving in favor of buyers at the moment. San Tan Valley (-9%), Tempe (-8%), Chandler (-6%), and Maricopa (-5%) feature prominently in the list of 12 cities moving in this direction. Queen Creek only went down 4% but is stuck at the bottom of the table.

We once again have 8 cities in a seller’s market, 4 balanced, and 6 in a buyer’s market.

CMI Secondary City Ranking Table - July 30, 2026

Over the last month, the secondary cities have done better for sellers than the major cities. Despite the overall buyer’s market, green up arrows outnumber the red down arrows by 7 to 5. There is much more movement in the CMI values for these smaller cities than for the large cities we monitor every day and report on once a week. The reason for the volatility is the same as for any statistical set with a small sample size. Fewer contracts, sales, and listings mean each individual event has a larger impact.

We see a huge improvement in Gold Canyon and Sun Lakes (again) in favor of sellers over the last 4 weeks, while Tolleson has again seen a large move in favor of buyers. Most other changes are relatively small.

The reason for the large improvement in Gold Canyon and Sun Lakes is the big drop in active listings in both these areas. Many sellers take their homes off the market for the summer, and those who are left face much less competition.

We have 5 cities in seller’s markets with their CMI over 110, with 5 in buyer’s markets with CMI under 90. The remaining 2 are in a balanced market between 90 and 110.

S&P/Cotality Case-Shiller Indexes for July 2026

July 28, 2026

The latest S&P Cotality Case-Shiller® Home Price Index® numbers were published today.

The new report covers home sales from March to May 2026. This means the typical home sale closed in mid-April, more than 3 months ago. We should remember that Case-Shiller data is based on older sales and does not include data from June 2026 onward.

Figures for Detroit were not made available again because data from the largest county in that area were not received in time. There were 18 cities showing rising prices, while San Diego was the only one to decline month-to-month. This time Phoenix returned to positive territory, so we were no longer the lone outlier we were in the previous report. The ignominy fell to our neighbors in San Diego CA.

Comparing with the previous month’s series, we see the following changes:

Phoenix is still an under-performer in the year-over-year table, and it remains in 15th place, the same as last month.

The average for the USA was +1.11%, so Phoenix is still well below that at -1.29%. When inflation is taken into account, 17 of the 19 cities have lower home prices than a year ago. Only Chicago at 6.93% and New York at 4.23% beat the latest inflation reading of 3.5%.

CMI Large City Ranking Table - July 23, 2026

The average CMI is down 0.8% from last month. This is marginally less favorable for buyers than last week. The market just does not seem to be able to make up its mind which direction to head. Supply has stabilized but is still drifting down slightly, while demand remains weak but has stopped getting worse. This does not add up to a perceptible change in the market as a whole, though several sub-markets are changing to a greater degree.

The number of cities moving in a direction favorable to buyers is twelve, one more than last week. We have only six moving in a direction that is favorable to sellers. Among these, Paradise Valley stands out for sellers with an exceptional +23%, with Cave Creek and Glendale far behind at +8% and +7%. In the other direction, the Southeast Valley is the main region moving in favor of buyers at the moment. San Tan Valley (-11%), Tempe (-8%), Chandler (-8%), and Maricopa (-8%) feature prominently in the list of 12 cities moving in this direction.

We once again have 8 cities in a seller’s market, 4 balanced, and 6 in a buyer’s market.

Cromford Market Snapshot - July 27, 2026

Most Homes Are Not Getting More Expensive

July 22, 2026

If we look at the annual median sales price across Greater Phoenix, we can see that it has been close to $450,000 for a very long time. However, it just reached a high of $454,000 on July 18, suggesting that homes are getting slightly more expensive. This is because the chart (and most people) ignore the falling buying power of the US currency. Doing otherwise can make you miserable and worried.

I fearlessly converted the nominal dollars in the chart to inflation-adjusted dollars, based on the Phoenix Consumer Price Index, with June 2026 as the base reading.

This puts the price into more realistic context. The typical home is cheaper now than at any time since the beginning of 2024, after adjusting for inflation. This chart represents a combination of all dwelling types, all price ranges, and all home sizes across Greater Phoenix. Things can look very different if you look at smaller segments of the market. Here is one example among many:

The chart above is for Gemini / Twin homes only. They tend to be a lot cheaper than single-family detached homes and are primarily concentrated in less expensive parts of the West Valley. As such, they have come down hard in price when adjusted for inflation, almost 14% cheaper than at the start of 2024.

You probably guessed which homes have actually become more expensive – single-family detached homes over 5,000 square feet are in the above chart, and even allowing for inflation, they are up to a median of $3.7M, with a much lower price of $3.2M at the start of 2024.

Taking out the inflation adjustment, we see nominal prices for these high-end homes are up 18% since the beginning of 2024. This is a completely different trajectory than for smaller and less expensive homes.

In most sectors, homes are cheaper relative to earnings and other things you might buy. However, large, expensive homes, especially in the Northeast Valley, have continued to rise in price even faster than inflation.

If you are wondering where these charts come from, they are extracted from the new website that we are preparing for launch later this year. They are not yet available for general use, as they are undergoing extensive testing, but if you are interested in becoming an early tester of the new site, drop me an email. In exchange for helping us with the testing, you will get early views of the new website’s features.

Incidentally, the new website will cover the whole of Arizona, although our data feed still comes from ARMLS rather than all the other Multiple Listing Services. Locations like Sedona / Verde Valley and Southeast Arizona have now joined ARMLS, and their data is available to us and will be shown in full on the new website when it launches. Our intent is to gradually expand Cromford Public to include county records from the other 13 counties, not just Maricopa and Pinal, but this will take longer because a lot of work needs to be done on data cleanup.

As a teaser, here is the same chart with the filter set for Southeast Arizona only:

Cromford Daily Market Snapshot - July 17, 2026

CMI Large City Ranking - July 16, 2026

The 21st Century Road to Housing Act

Cromford Daily Market Snapshot - July 12, 2026

CMI Large City Ranking - July 9, 2026

Maricopa Affidavit Stats for June 2026

Cromford Market Snapshot - July 5, 2026

Monthly Home Sales Stats

Cromford Market Index - July 2, 2026

Single-famiiy markets in the 18 largest cities.

June 2026 - Infographic

May 2026 - Infographic

April 2026 - Infographic

March 2026 - Infographic

February 2026 - Infographic

January 2026 - Infographic

December 2025 - Infographic

November 2025 - Infographic

October 2025 - Infographic

September 2025 - Infographic

August 2025 - Infographic

July 2025 - Infographic

June 2025 - Infographic

May 2025 - Infographic

Make it stand out

Whatever it is, the way you tell your story online can make all the difference.

April 2025 - Infographic

Make it stand out

Whatever it is, the way you tell your story online can make all the difference.

March 2025 - Infographic

Make it stand out

Whatever it is, the way you tell your story online can make all the difference.

February 2025 - Infographic

January 2025 - Infographic

Make it stand out

Whatever it is, the way you tell your story online can make all the difference.

December 2024 - Infographic

Make it stand out

Whatever it is, the way you tell your story online can make all the difference.

Previous
Previous

💰 Is Your Earnest Money Really Safe?

Next
Next

🎥Content That Closes